From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 14 05:50:15 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95757106566B; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 05:50:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yanegomi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com (mail-tul01m020-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 447108FC14; Wed, 14 Dec 2011 05:50:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by obbwd18 with SMTP id wd18so28039obb.13 for ; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 21:50:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JZL2vhGcRrfKdI5lFlxuwDqJh3MjvhvlUkM1KvI3oAc=; b=hJXjrU5F3bhBXHFLlHm57imrmumZ9WPrmoBlLXYZzDqIFmxBrmnv8Oeo2AIJcqGZVh B15CwihnUbchCrXN4zCKKxh+vAm7PotqZ5wRO9Lmsff+uShunPrh6R+nhWSh1a4Gos07 OBlsL2TK6rlgHLOoStKia94nAF0xJPOeMP3a8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.182.231.38 with SMTP id td6mr5186509obc.66.1323841814617; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 21:50:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.62.227 with HTTP; Tue, 13 Dec 2011 21:50:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4EE8344C.2070509@freebsd.org> References: <201112140350.pBE3ns2M011225@fire.js.berklix.net> <4EE8344C.2070509@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 21:50:14 -0800 Message-ID: From: Garrett Cooper To: Julian Elischer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "Julian H. Stacey" , Doug Barton , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CVS removal from the base X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2011 05:50:15 -0000 On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Julian Elischer wrote= : > On 12/13/11 7:49 PM, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > > which brings up teh possibility of 1st class ports.. which are kept more = =A0as > part of the system.. > (sorry for sounding like a broken =A0record..) *jumps back into the fray* If it's something that isn't maintainable, because the upstream package is too hard to follow across a major version release cycle, it should be pulled from base. Otherwise, I'd say carry on as usual. Otherwise, there really isn't any difference in package organization from Linux; granted, I would still like to see granular definitions in packaging metadata so one could pick and choose between base and ports openssh for instance, but that's still a nicety that hasn't come true. Thanks, -Garrett