From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Sep  6 06:45:52 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B263216A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Mon,  6 Sep 2004 06:45:52 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from bsam.ru (gw.ipt.ru [80.253.10.66])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7290C43D46
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Mon,  6 Sep 2004 06:45:52 +0000 (GMT)	(envelope-from bsam@bsam.ru)
Received: from bsam by bsam.ru with local (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD)
	id 1C4DH1-0008Zo-DD
	for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Mon, 06 Sep 2004 10:46:43 +0400
Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2004 10:46:43 +0400
From: "Boris B. Samorodov" <bsam@ipt.ru>
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20040906064643.GB32825@ipt.ru>
References: <20040906063136.GA32825@ipt.ru>
	<20040906063152.GC72089@funkthat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040906063152.GC72089@funkthat.com>
Sender: "Boris B. Samorodov" <bsam@bsam.ru>
Subject: Re: gdb-6 in 5.3-BETA3
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2004 06:45:52 -0000

On Sun, Sep 05, 2004 at 11:31:52PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:

> Boris B. Samorodov wrote this message on Mon, Sep 06, 2004 at 10:31 +0400:
> > New gdb V.6 in base system doesn't have option '-k', while the ports's
> > version has. Is it planned to be fixed till 5.3-RELEASE?
> 
> but there is kgdb....

OK. kgdb works fine.

But it is not clear from "man gdb", that if option "gdb -k" is not
working, one should use "kgdb".

>   John-Mark Gurney				Voice: +1 415 225 5579

WBR
-- 
bsam