From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jun 26 19:44:01 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E9C471A
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 19:44:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85D9E20CD
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 19:44:01 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s5QJi1Zh001650
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 26 Jun 2014 20:44:01 +0100 (BST)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 191152] [NEW PORT] x11-fonts/hasklig
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 19:44:01 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me
X-Bugzilla-Who: rakuco@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: Needs Triage
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-191152-13-9NjFWaJzor@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-191152-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-191152-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2014 19:44:01 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D191152

--- Comment #5 from Raphael Kubo da Costa <rakuco@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to Raphael Kubo da Costa from comment #1)
> > BUILD_DEPENDS=3Dfc-cache:${PORTSDIR}/x11-fonts/fontconfig
> > RUN_DEPENDS:=3D	${BUILD_DEPENDS}
>=20
> I believe fontconfig can be declared as a runtime dependency only, as it =
is
> only invoked when the port is installed and deinstalled. In any case, the
> second assignment could be a normal one, since nothing else changes
> BUILD_DEPENDS.

I didn't see any change in this part, even though the port built fine here
without the BUILD_DEPENDS line. Have you given it any thought?

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.=