From owner-freebsd-i18n Thu May 17 0:24:38 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-i18n@freebsd.org Received: from rivendell.prod.astec.co.jp (rivendell.prod.astec.co.jp [61.121.193.145]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16BC337B423; Thu, 17 May 2001 00:24:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tshiozak@bsdclub.org) Received: from bondy.prod.astec.co.jp (bondy.prod.astec.co.jp [2002:3d79:c191:a:a00:20ff:fe8e:e310]) by rivendell.prod.astec.co.jp (8.11.3+3.4W/8.11.3/prodgate/smtpfeed 1.12) with ESMTP id f4H7OYf12074; Thu, 17 May 2001 16:24:34 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (aoi.prod.astec.co.jp [2002:3d79:c191:1a:2aa:ff:febd:6e6f]) by bondy.prod.astec.co.jp (8.11.3+3.4W/8.11.3/prodhub) with ESMTP id f4H7OXg29449; Thu, 17 May 2001 16:24:34 +0900 (JST) Date: Thu, 17 May 2001 16:24:33 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20010517.162433.68560115.tshiozak@astec.co.jp> To: obrien@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: tshiozak@FreeBSD.ORG, i18n@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: wchar.h / Citrus import From: "T.SHIOZAKI" In-Reply-To: <20010516133834.A8987@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20010515044454.A6122@nagual.pp.ru> <20010514203700.A16280@peorth.iteration.net> <20010516133834.A8987@dragon.nuxi.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.95b121 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN) X-My-Status: SuperAoiMoe Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-i18n@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG From: "David O'Brien" Subject: Re: wchar.h / Citrus import Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 13:38:34 -0700 Message-ID: <20010516133834.A8987@dragon.nuxi.com> > I was quite taken back by your commit of the Citrus bits considering we > were in the middle of a discussion about it. > > Anyway, can you educate us about your intentions for the future of this > code? My intention for my workings I will do for FreeBSD is, if anything, not "import" but "feedback". Citrus XPG4DL is not from-scratch works but derived-works from FreeBSD. Certainly, the codes I've committed a few days ago are newly-built codes (however, these code are made for nvi-m17n by itojun and have been used for several years), but the most codes I intend to commit are just reforms of FreeBSD codes. From the first (about 20 months ago), I began the works for FreeBSD. I should feedback immediately, and I indented to do so at that time, but I didn't it by some reasons; I was not FreeBSD committer, I prefered that the feedback working was done by various committer rather than myself since I was migrating my main platform to NetBSD at the time, and I was busy by other works. Several Japanese FreeBSD committers offered to do it instead of me, but they seemed busier than me and let the work be. So, Umemoto-san lately invited me to do it by myself directly. I thought I'm adopted to FreeBSD committer for feedbacking XPG4DL to FreeBSD under already-concensused, and I felt I'm hurried up. David, I'm sorry, I misunderstood your message as hurrying me up. Under the current status, Cirtus XPG4DL has the two roles: 1. first-step code for porting FreeBSD locale stuffs to NetBSD, and 2. supplement of lacking faculties we need. The former role is coming to end. I just indent to return the improvement, as a result of the latter role of XPG4DL, to FreeBSD once again. After that, I indent to restart Citrus works. > The committed files have style issues (RCS IDs are just one example). I would be grad to point out more concretely or fix it yourself. Preferably, please fix style of the codes I'll commit as if they were a part of FreeBSD without constraint. Then, I'll re-import the codes to Citrus and NetBSD, if possible. -- Takuya SHIOZAKI To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-i18n" in the body of the message