From owner-freebsd-current  Sat May 13 13: 7:27 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from pozo.com (pozo.com [216.101.162.50])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 111BB37B9AC
	for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 13 May 2000 13:07:20 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mantar@pacbell.net)
Received: from dual.pacbell.net (dual.pozo.com [216.101.162.51])
	by pozo.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA00268;
	Sat, 13 May 2000 13:07:01 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mantar@pacbell.net)
Message-Id: <4.3.2.3.2.20000513130322.00b34a48@pozo.com>
X-Sender: null@pozo.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2.3 (Beta)
Date: Sat, 13 May 2000 13:07:00 -0700
To: Assar Westerlund <assar@sics.se>,
	Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl>
From: Manfred Antar <mantar@pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: MAKEDEV Warning ???
Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <5lwvkyz0n0.fsf@assaris.sics.se>
References: <Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven's message of "Sat, 13 May 2000 21:07:31 +0200">
 <4.3.2.3.2.20000513115532.00b32ee8@pozo.com>
 <20000513210731.C31594@lucifer.bart.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

At 09:54 PM 5/13/2000 +0200, Assar Westerlund wrote:
>Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl> writes:
> > -On [20000513 21:06], Manfred Antar (mantar@pacbell.net) wrote:
> > >I get this in boot mesgs and I don't know how to fix it.
> > >Device char-major=13 minor=0 opened in block mode, convert to char mode
> > >with /dev/MAKEDEV before 2000-07-01
> > 
> > There is a bug somewhere in the rootmount code.
>
>The following patch fixed the problem for me.  For extra points,
>rename the function.
>
>/assar
>
>--- vfs_subr.c~ Sat May  6 00:08:38 2000
>+++ vfs_subr.c  Sat May 13 21:47:08 2000
>@@ -1296,7 +1296,7 @@
>                 return (error);
>         }
>         vp = nvp;
>-       vp->v_type = VBLK;
>+       vp->v_type = VCHR;
>         addalias(vp, dev);
>         *vpp = vp;
>         return (0);
That works for me too .
Which is the correct dev  /dev/da0a , /dev/rda0a , or /dev/da0s1a to use
rda0a won't work. da0a works fine and I got rid of all the da0s1a,b,e,f,g ones ?
Manfred
=====================
||    mantar@pacbell.net       ||
||    Ph. (415) 681-6235        ||
=====================



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message