From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 23 15:40:05 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3461A106564A for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 15:40:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from piso@southcross.wired.org) Received: from mail.oltrelinux.com (krisma.oltrelinux.com [194.242.226.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBB318FC19 for ; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 15:40:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from piso@southcross.wired.org) Received: from southcross.wired.org (host-84-221-247-188.cust-adsl.tiscali.it [84.221.247.188]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.oltrelinux.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C27111AE6C; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 16:40:03 +0100 (CET) Received: (from piso@localhost) by southcross.wired.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id m2NFePnj029845; Sun, 23 Mar 2008 16:40:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from piso) Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 16:40:24 +0100 From: Paolo Pisati To: Robert Huff Message-ID: <20080323154024.GA29537@tin.it> References: <18405.50481.878438.534290@jerusalem.litteratus.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <18405.50481.878438.534290@jerusalem.litteratus.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at krisma.oltrelinux.com Cc: ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: new NAT method ?? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 15:40:05 -0000 On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 10:49:21PM -0400, Robert Huff wrote: > > (I am not subscribed; please "CC:" me.) > I have been told that for 7.0+, network address translation > involving ipfw no longer uses natd(8). > Is this so? > If it is, where do I find documentation on the new correct way > to do things? no, natd is there and works fine. in kernel nat for ipfw was just added, for more info see ipfw man page. -- bye, P.