From owner-freebsd-mobile Fri Apr 16 10:15:23 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from moss.nibb.ac.jp (moss.nibb.ac.jp [133.48.46.64]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4ED115962 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 1999 10:15:20 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tomoaki@biol.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by moss.nibb.ac.jp (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA21791; Sat, 17 Apr 1999 02:12:46 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from tomoaki@biol.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp) To: listmail@helena.callcenter.systemhaus.net Cc: freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: tomoaki@biol.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Subject: Re: Fiberline Ethernet, part two From: Tomoaki NISHIYAMA In-Reply-To: <199904161617.SAA02434@helena.otelo-call.de> References: <199904161617.SAA02434@helena.otelo-call.de> <199904161657.SAA02539@helena.otelo-call.de> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94b8 on Emacs 19.34 / Mule 2.3 (SUETSUMUHANA) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <19990417021245Y.tomoaki@moss.nibb.ac.jp> Date: Sat, 17 Apr 1999 02:12:45 +0900 X-Dispatcher: imput version 990212(IM106) Lines: 41 Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org From: Christoph Weber-Fahr Subject: Fiberline Ethernet, part two Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 18:17:31 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <199904161617.SAA02434@helena.otelo-call.de> listmail> Now I have 2.2.8-RELEASE on the Laptop in question, and can't get listmail> the card to work, either. It is the 'driver allocation failed' listmail> problem which hints, according to net.wisdom derived from dejanews, listmail> to a resource conflict. Yes, this happens when you don't have an appropriate free irq. Can you figure out which irq should be used by the card? From: Christoph Weber-Fahr Subject: Fiberline Ethernet, part two Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 18:17:31 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <199904161617.SAA02434@helena.otelo-call.de> listmail> #Fiberline FL-4680 Ethernet listmail> card "Ethernet" "Adapter" listmail> config 0x1 "ed0" ? usually the config line seems to be written as config default "ed0" any ^^^ note that "?" is not used in sample configuration file. Knowing that windows used irq 11 it may help to specify explicitly config 0x1 "ed0" 11 listmail> ...not in the kernel file but only in the kernel config at startup. Is listmail> there a problem with this (do I _have_ to use the entry in the kernel listmail> config file at compile time) ? No, you don't have to specify them in the kernel config. They are ignored. By the way, do you mention the pure 2.2.8 release or 2.2.8 release with PAO? I'm not sure how match of the PAO integrated to 2.2.8 release and I am using 2.2.7 release with PAO patch. -------- Tomoaki Nishiyama e-mail:tomoaki@biol.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message