From owner-freebsd-current Tue Apr 25 13:11:18 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mail.ddg.com (eunuch.ddg.com [216.30.58.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F144D37B6AF; Tue, 25 Apr 2000 13:11:03 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rkw@dataplex.net) Received: from nomad.dataplex.net (24.28.73.209) by mail.ddg.com with SMTP (Eudora Internet Mail Server 2.1); Tue, 25 Apr 2000 15:10:53 -0500 From: Richard Wackerbarth To: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Archive pruning Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2000 15:10:53 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.1.41] Content-Type: text/plain References: In-Reply-To: Cc: current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <00042515105300.02802@nomad.dataplex.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 25 Apr 2000, you wrote: > I told myself I wouldn't get into this debate with you again, Richard, but > you're not listening. The vast majority (all? I might have missed one) of > the other respondants Actually, I didn't start this. Someone else brought up the idea. > P.S. Please don't tell me I'm being a "sandbox developer", because I've > yet to see the hordes of non-developers crying out for this system either. I don't disagree that the majority of the readers of this list are not interested. The quiet majority that might benefit are not very likely to speak up when they are told some is impossible. After all, they are at the mercy of the very developers who oppose change because it does not directly benefit the developers. I do object to the characterization by these developers that it CANNOT be done. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message