From owner-freebsd-current Sat May 13 13:28:35 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from lucifer.bart.nl (lucifer.bart.nl [194.158.168.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22E8537BAD6 for ; Sat, 13 May 2000 13:28:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from asmodai@lucifer.bart.nl) Received: (from asmodai@localhost) by lucifer.bart.nl (8.9.3/8.9.3) id WAA32440; Sat, 13 May 2000 22:28:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from asmodai) Date: Sat, 13 May 2000 22:28:25 +0200 From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven To: Manfred Antar Cc: Assar Westerlund , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: MAKEDEV Warning ??? Message-ID: <20000513222825.B32232@lucifer.bart.nl> References: <20000513210731.C31594@lucifer.bart.nl> <5lwvkyz0n0.fsf@assaris.sics.se> <4.3.2.3.2.20000513130322.00b34a48@pozo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.3.2.20000513130322.00b34a48@pozo.com>; from mantar@pacbell.net on Sat, May 13, 2000 at 01:07:00PM -0700 Organisation: VIA Net.Works The Netherlands Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -On [20000513 22:08], Manfred Antar (mantar@pacbell.net) wrote: >Which is the correct dev /dev/da0a , /dev/rda0a , or /dev/da0s1a to use >rda0a won't work. da0a works fine and I got rid of all the da0s1a,b,e,f,g ones ? The /dev/da0s1a would be the correct one to use, example: # Device Mountpoint FStype Options Dump Pass# /dev/da0s1b none swap sw 0 0 /dev/da0s1a / ufs rw 1 1 /dev/da0s1e /tmp ufs rw 2 2 /dev/da0s1g /usr ufs rw 2 2 /dev/da0s1f /var ufs rw 2 2 /dev/da0s1h /work ufs rw 2 2 /dev/cd0c /cdrom cd9660 ro,noauto 0 0 proc /proc procfs rw 0 0 /dev/fd0 /diskette msdos rw,noauto 0 0 -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven Network- and systemadministrator VIA Net.Works The Netherlands BSD: Technical excellence at its best http://www.via-net-works.nl I walk, I walk alone, into the promised land... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message