From owner-freebsd-current Wed Aug 18 20:53:15 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from peach.ocn.ne.jp (peach.ocn.ne.jp [210.145.254.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DF9815A46 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 20:53:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dcs@newsguy.com) Received: from newsguy.com by peach.ocn.ne.jp (8.9.1a/OCN) id MAA26733; Thu, 19 Aug 1999 12:49:40 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <37B948CA.6E2DE113@newsguy.com> Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 20:34:34 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (Win98; I) X-Accept-Language: en,pt-BR,ja MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Dillon Cc: Andrzej Bialecki , Poul-Henning Kamp , Marcel Moolenaar , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Q: Extending the sysctl MIB for Linuxulator variables References: <199908161709.KAA10454@apollo.backplane.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Matthew Dillon wrote: > > :Well, it's also a module, so perhaps we should create the whole subtree > :for modules (as was already discussed several times..) > : > :Andrzej Bialecki > > Yes, this is very true. But I think we are fooling ourselves if we > believe linux emulation will not become 'standard' in the near future. > Then we'll kick ourselves for giving the sysctl's convoluted names :-) Also, the way we choose to tread leds to a highly modularized kernel. Placing stuff in a "module" category would be somewhat redundant, then. -- Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS) dcs@newsguy.com dcs@freebsd.org "You intend to eat me, then?" he asked the dragon. "Well, I must admit, more for the amusement than the taste." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message