From owner-cvs-all  Tue Feb 13 10:55:49 2001
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from iguana.aciri.org (iguana.aciri.org [192.150.187.36])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A818337B491; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 10:55:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from rizzo@localhost)
	by iguana.aciri.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f1DIpRd31515;
	Tue, 13 Feb 2001 10:51:27 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from rizzo)
From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@aciri.org>
Message-Id: <200102131851.f1DIpRd31515@iguana.aciri.org>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet ip_fw.c ip_fw.h src/sbin/ipfw ipfw.8 ipfw.c
In-Reply-To: <52786.982090097@critter> from Poul-Henning Kamp at "Feb 13, 2001  7:48:17 pm"
To: phk@critter.freebsd.dk (Poul-Henning Kamp)
Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 10:51:27 -0800 (PST)
Cc: rizzo@aciri.org, imp@harmony.village.org,
	cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> I still think having separate lists, with well defined insert
> points would make it a lot easier for people.
> 
> I generally meet a lot of people who have trouble with the
> fact that a forwarded packet gets filteret twice...

yes, i agree with you. I was just trying to figure out
how hard would it be to implement the separate lists, and fortunately
it seems close to trivial.

	cheers
	luigi


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message