From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Jul  3 14: 0:16 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from overcee.netplex.com.au (overcee.netplex.com.au [202.12.86.7])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFDF915260
	for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org>; Sat,  3 Jul 1999 13:59:43 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au)
Received: from netplex.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by overcee.netplex.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id AE91578; Sun,  4 Jul 1999 04:59:41 +0800 (WST)
	(envelope-from peter@netplex.com.au)
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98
To: Peter Holm <peter@holm.cc>
Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: 12 trap in rfork+0x22 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 03 Jul 1999 22:27:41 +0200."
             <377E723D.19674A38@holm.cc> 
Date: Sun, 04 Jul 1999 04:59:41 +0800
From: Peter Wemm <peter@netplex.com.au>
Message-Id: <19990703205941.AE91578@overcee.netplex.com.au>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Peter Holm wrote:

> I don't know is this is of any interest, but a rfork(0) will cause a
> fault. I have included a patch.

Argh!

Thanks, Committed..  (rev 1.63 kern_fork.c)

Cheers,
-Peter




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message