From owner-freebsd-current Sun Apr 23 12:22:16 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from apollo.backplane.com (apollo.backplane.com [216.240.41.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AAC837BA43; Sun, 23 Apr 2000 12:22:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon@apollo.backplane.com) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by apollo.backplane.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id MAA63538; Sun, 23 Apr 2000 12:22:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2000 12:22:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon Message-Id: <200004231922.MAA63538@apollo.backplane.com> To: "Rodney W. Grimes" Cc: phk@critter.freebsd.dk (Poul-Henning Kamp), freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux emulation scripting fix to be committed to 5.x and 4.x wednesday References: <200004231913.MAA09141@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :> : :> :-- :> :Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 :> :> I think you're confused, Poul. I've gone over the commits made :> to the tree by people over the last few months and frankly there :> are dozens of simultanious -current and -stable commits. A quick :> check shows that most of them are trivial bug fixes. : :And look at how many of them had to be patched, re-merged, etc. IMHO :people are getting way way to loose with MFC right after a commit. I :don't even want to see a MFC for a 1 character spelling fixed MFC'ed :in less than 3 days anymore. : :-- :Rod Grimes - KD7CAX @ CN85sl - (RWG25) rgrimes@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net Perfectly acceptable to me ... *IF* core decides to change the rules they've made for the current development trees (stable and current) and makes an official statement that covers everyone rather then just Matt. I think the work required to accomplish the BSDI merger is overrated anyway (in regards to the source tree). I kinda expected the BSDI people to start working on it immediately but obviously the pace is going to be a lot slower. Core should consider reverting the special rules that were originally created with the expectation of major breakage in 5.x back to the set of rules we had for 3.x and 4.x. -Matt Matthew Dillon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message