From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Sep 30 13:54:11 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5D2616A4B3
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 30 Sep 2003 13:54:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.web.de (smtp01.web.de [217.72.192.180])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAD9C44001
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 30 Sep 2003 13:54:08 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from thorsten.greiner@web.de)
Received: from [80.141.7.115] (helo=tybalt)
	by smtp.web.de with asmtp (WEB.DE 4.99 #448)
	id 1A4RVR-0000Ly-00; Tue, 30 Sep 2003 22:54:01 +0200
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 22:54:00 +0200
From: Thorsten Greiner <thorsten.greiner@web.de>
To: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
Message-ID: <20030930205400.GA4391@tybalt.greiner.local>
References: <20030929211413.GA953@tybalt.greiner.local>
	<9022.1064908933@critter.freebsd.dk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <9022.1064908933@critter.freebsd.dk>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
Sender: thorsten.greiner@web.de
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Problems with geom_bde
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 20:54:11 -0000

* Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> [2003-09-30 10:54]:
> Did you call "gbde detach" before the umount ?  You need to unmount
> first.

After investigating further I think I have found the reason for the
problem. When I created the disklabel for the partition I was lazy
and entered a size of 2000000 blocks for the slice. I just tried to
reproduce the problem and re-created the slice with a size of 1024M
(which is 2097152 blocks) and the problem seems to have disappeared
- at least I cannot reproduce it anymore.

So now I wonder if there is any magic constant which the slice size
needs to be a multiple of...?

Regards
        -Thorsten

-- 
There are 10 kinds of people in the world, those who
understand binary and those who don't.