From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Feb 27 16:25: 3 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from rock.ghis.net (rock.ghis.net [209.222.164.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB82737B74E; Sun, 27 Feb 2000 16:25:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from will@blackdawn.com) Received: from shadow.blackdawn.com (postfix@13-018.008.popsite.net [209.69.195.18] (may be forged)) by rock.ghis.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA06404; Sun, 27 Feb 2000 16:24:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by shadow.blackdawn.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3C20418A2; Sun, 27 Feb 2000 19:24:50 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 19:24:50 -0500 From: Will Andrews To: Steve Price Cc: Will Andrews , Doug Barton , obrien@FreeBSD.ORG, Satoshi Asami , ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: QUICK RESPONCE NEEDED: Netscape 4.72 handling Message-ID: <20000227192450.D21819@shadow.blackdawn.com> References: <20000227191320.B21819@shadow.blackdawn.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i In-Reply-To: ; from sprice@hiwaay.net on Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 06:20:27PM -0600 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.4-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, Feb 27, 2000 at 06:20:27PM -0600, Steve Price wrote: > The problem with making strong encryption a knob is the same reason > you state below. We won't have the packages for them anymore and > Mr. O'Brien will probably be a mite bit upset over that. :) I thought about this. But I came up with the gotcha: How can you distribute packages if they contain strong encryption? :-) -- Will Andrews GCS/E/S @d- s+:+>+:- a--->+++ C++ UB++++ P+ L- E--- W+++ !N !o ?K w--- ?O M+ V-- PS+ PE++ Y+ PGP+>+++ t++ 5 X++ R+ tv+ b++>++++ DI+++ D+ G++>+++ e->++++ h! r-->+++ y? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message