From owner-freebsd-hackers Sat Nov 18 13:18:39 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from silby.com (cb34181-c.mdsn1.wi.home.com [24.183.3.139]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BB3137B479 for ; Sat, 18 Nov 2000 13:18:37 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 53216 invoked by uid 1000); 18 Nov 2000 21:18:36 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 18 Nov 2000 21:18:36 -0000 Date: Sat, 18 Nov 2000 15:18:36 -0600 (CST) From: Mike Silbersack To: Jesper Skriver Cc: Alfred Perlstein , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: React to ICMP administratively prohibited ? In-Reply-To: <20001118183632.A99512@skriver.dk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, 18 Nov 2000, Jesper Skriver wrote: > > or just stop filtering totally. > > Which is not a option in this case, and in the real world it's that > uncommon. > > I'll see if I can get code together which will do this. > > If we leave this off by default, would people object to putting in > this functionality ? > > /Jesper What's the point? If people complain about a badly setup MX behind a firewall, are you going to respond and tell them to flip a sysctl? This isn't a case of interoperability with a common TCP stack which needs to be lived with. It's a case of something that is broken even with the suggested "fix". The correct thing to do in this situation is to configure sendmail properly so that the MX silliness isn't needed. Mike "Silby" Silbersack To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message