From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 9 21:39:51 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6D1E16A4EB for ; Mon, 9 May 2005 21:39:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail22.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.24]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6798543D7B for ; Mon, 9 May 2005 21:39:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 15607 invoked from network); 9 May 2005 21:39:51 -0000 Received: from server.baldwin.cx ([216.27.160.63]) (envelope-sender )AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 9 May 2005 21:39:50 -0000 Received: from [10.50.41.242] (gw1.twc.weather.com [216.133.140.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.baldwin.cx (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j49LdcHu043992; Mon, 9 May 2005 17:39:41 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.org Date: Mon, 9 May 2005 14:16:36 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.8 References: <20050509141903.GA34596@svzserv.kemerovo.su> In-Reply-To: <20050509141903.GA34596@svzserv.kemerovo.su> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200505091416.37378.jhb@FreeBSD.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.8 required=4.2 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=failed version=3.0.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.2 (2004-11-16) on server.baldwin.cx cc: acpi@FreeBSD.org cc: Eugene Grosbein Subject: Re: 5.4: pci_link problem on 440BX X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 May 2005 21:39:52 -0000 On Monday 09 May 2005 10:19 am, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > Hi! > > I observe ATA timeouts with 5.4-STABLE using hardware > that works rock stable with 4.11-STABLE. > The workaround is to disable pci_link using /boot/loader.conf > Details are here: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/80815 > > Requests for additional information are welcomed. > > Eugene Grosbein Are any of the IRQs different when you do use the pci_link code compared to the dmesg when you have pci_link disabled? -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org