From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 21 16:47:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 644D216A4CE for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 16:47:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from TRANG.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C9C43D1D for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 16:47:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by TRANG.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i5LGl0Sr002913; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 09:47:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i5LGkwFs002911; Mon, 21 Jun 2004 09:46:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 09:46:57 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Max Laier Message-ID: <20040621164657.GA2544@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20040620134437.P94503@fw.reifenberger.com> <20040620230350.O1720@fw.reifenberger.com> <20040621105114.G9108@fw.reifenberger.com> <200406211639.22243.max@love2party.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200406211639.22243.max@love2party.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: Michael Reifenberger cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: startup error for pflogd X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 16:47:04 -0000 On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 04:39:10PM +0200, Max Laier wrote: > This might seem like OpenBSD/paranoia, but my opinion on it is: It's done so > why not port it over? It also helps to keep the diff down (which means less > work). > > If there is no resistance against "yet another user", I will add _pflogd. I would prefer just 'pflogd' until it is discussed if we want to follow the _ way. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)