From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 13 18:30:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3607216A4CE; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 18:30:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from tigra.ip.net.ua (tigra.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45E0543D1D; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 18:30:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: from heffalump.ip.net.ua (heffalump.ip.net.ua [82.193.96.213]) by tigra.ip.net.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8DIUaR3093076 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 13 Sep 2004 21:30:37 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru@ip.net.ua) Received: (from ru@localhost) by heffalump.ip.net.ua (8.13.1/8.13.1) id i8DIUcJG025872; Mon, 13 Sep 2004 21:30:38 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 21:30:38 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Andre Oppermann Message-ID: <20040913183038.GA25795@ip.net.ua> References: <4145D02C.D02A18A0@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4145D02C.D02A18A0@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ipfw tee fixed [cvs commit: src/sbin/ipfw ipfw.8 src/sys/netinet ip_fw_pfil.c] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2004 18:30:42 -0000 --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 06:51:56PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote: > I've fixed 'ipfw tee' in 6-current. Please try it and report back. This > is pretty useful for passive packet monitoring. >=20 Just to make it crystal clear for everyone, the tee'd fragments are still reassembled into a full packet before the diversion, correct? Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBRedOqRfpzJluFF4RAtknAKCP9xT0XjcmUjmIWKdQb0MqDydDWACeIxlL Duj8NpWbNx9C53DRlSME+VE= =HWeL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --BOKacYhQ+x31HxR3--