From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 18 02:26:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A43016A412 for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 02:26:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trunasuci@mail.com) Received: from webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com (webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com [205.158.62.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F8CC43DD0 for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 02:24:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trunasuci@mail.com) Received: from unknown (unknown [192.168.9.180]) by webmail-outgoing.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix) with QMQP id CD33218001A3 for ; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 02:30:39 +0000 (GMT) X-OB-Received: from unknown (205.158.62.182) by wfilter.us4.outblaze.com; 18 Sep 2006 02:30:40 -0000 Received: by ws1-6.us4.outblaze.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A10061CE304; Mon, 18 Sep 2006 02:30:39 +0000 (GMT) Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: "Ahmad Arafat Abdullah" To: backyard1454-bsd@yahoo.com, "pobox@verysmall.org" , "Matthew Seaman" Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 18:30:39 -0800 Received: from [60.49.202.201] by ws1-6.us4.outblaze.com with http for trunasuci@mail.com; Sun, 17 Sep 2006 18:30:39 -0800 X-Originating-Ip: 60.49.202.201 X-Originating-Server: ws1-6.us4.outblaze.com Message-Id: <20060918023039.A10061CE304@ws1-6.us4.outblaze.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how to apply a patch set X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 02:26:10 -0000 > ----- Original Message ----- > From: backyard > To: "Ahmad Arafat Abdullah" , "pobox@verysmall.org" <= pobox@verysmall.org>, "Matthew Seaman" > Subject: Re: how to apply a patch set > Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2006 19:00:24 -0700 (PDT) >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > --- Ahmad Arafat Abdullah wrote: >=20 > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "pobox@verysmall.org" > > > To: "Matthew Seaman" > > > > > Subject: Re: how to apply a patch set > > > Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2006 00:48:32 +0200 > > > > > Matthew Seaman wrote: > > > > pobox@verysmall.org wrote: > > > >> Hello, > > > >> > > > >> I am trying to apply a patch set to FreeBSD 5.5 > > (this letter 'p' > > > >> followed by a number, after the version in > > 'uname -a') - but somehow it > > > >> did not work. > > > >> > > > >> I cvsup-ed the src using the standard > > 'stable-supfile' with '*default > > > >> release=3Dcvs tag=3DRELENG_5_5' - then I rebuild > > world. > > > >> > > > >> Now 'uname -a' reports 'FreeBSD 5.5 STABLE #0'. > > Before it was 'FreeBSD > > > >> 5.5 RELEASE #0'. So instead of applying patch > > set I have moved to 'STABLE'. > > > >> > > > >> Could somebody tell me what have I done wrong? > > Actually - what is the > > > >> difference between the 'pX' and the '#X' after > > the version? > > > > > > > > You've shifted your self onto the RELENG_5 code > > branch rather than the > > > > RELENG_5_5 branch. > > > > Yes... but how did it happen after I instructed > > the supfile to get > 'RELENG_5_5'? > > > > Actually in the examples/cvsup I did not find any > > example how to do 'release'. > > > > Thank you for the other answers! > > > Iv. > > > > > > > > > > > > i think I've read abt this long time ago.. but not > > pretty sure ( someone correct me if I'm wrong ).. > > > > u can try: > > > > *default release=3Dcvs tag=3DRELENG_5_5_RELEASE > > > > > > anyway i never tried this! and i never encounter the > > prob u'va said since 4.x ---> 6.1 > > ( and I'm normally/mostly using -pX than STABLE for > > my prod server ). Seems your method/tag > > > > tag=3DRELENG_5_5 is correct way to patch to -pX, i > > can't find any reason why your system "patched" > > into STABLE... > > > > could u please copy+paste here your stable-supfile > > config? > > > > TQ > > >=20 > STABLE is the latest set of "patches" to the system. > It will change the tag from RELEASE from the install > to the STABLE set of patches versus the CURRENT set. > STABLE is the major ones you want. CURRENT is all of > them to date. >=20 > If you cvsup to RELEASE you will downgrade and end up > with what you started with when you installed from CD > or whatever was available when the RELEASE cd was > created for whatever system your getting. >=20 > -brian ermm.. for me ( and as far as i know ) STABLE is a development patch and it will e= nd up with the next RELEASE version.. such as 5.4-STABLE will be patch gradually = until it became 5.5-RELEASE. Anyway 5.4-RELEASE-pX is a security fixes ( and poss= ibly bugfix ) but it still remains as RELEASE and not "migrating_into_the_next_version/re= lease". some of the people ( like me ) just prefer to -pX rather than -STABLE. So f= ar i'm not needed -CURRENT yet even RELEASE -pX is powerful enough and suits my needs for my prod servers.. for this case ( back to the topics ), I think this guy do the right method = for cvsup-ed to 5.5-RELEASE-pX but it end up with 5.5-STABLE. So i think we better help him and solve it s= ince he maybe not need -STABLE like u said TQ p/s: Correct me if I'm wrong anyone!=20 --=20 ___________________________________________________ Play 100s of games for FREE! http://games.mail.com