From owner-freebsd-chat  Mon Aug 25 13:47:25 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA08913
          for chat-outgoing; Mon, 25 Aug 1997 13:47:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elmira.functional.com (root@elmira.functional.com [198.82.216.52])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA08845
          for <freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 25 Aug 1997 13:46:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from elmira.functional.com (grail@localhost.functional.com [127.0.0.1])
	by elmira.functional.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA12662;
	Mon, 25 Aug 1997 16:37:12 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199708252037.QAA12662@elmira.functional.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97
To: Peter Korsten <peter@grendel.IAEhv.nl>
cc: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: ATT Unix for Windows ! 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 25 Aug 1997 20:49:32 +0200."
             <19970825204932.12036@grendel.IAEhv.nl> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 1997 16:37:11 -0400
From: Giao Nguyen <grail@functional.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Peter Korsten said:
> I suppose you mean that it's a disadvantage that you have to buy
> this software? Because I think Visual C++ is an excellent developer
> environment, at least a whole lot better than the gvim/gcc/xxgdb
> combination I use on FreeBSD.

I dunno. I used the Microsoft Visual C++ environment almost on a daily 
basis. I wasn't that thrilled. It's well integrated, certainly. 
Personally I like the xemacs/gcc/ddd combo.

Granted these are very disjointed products. However, xemacs and make 
presents a very usable interface and it's object browser isn't bad if 
you use it all.

But that's just me ....