From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Feb 10 10:58:28 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C8097B;
 Sun, 10 Feb 2013 10:58:28 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA77363C;
 Sun, 10 Feb 2013 10:58:28 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502)
 id 483DE6003; Sun, 10 Feb 2013 04:58:22 -0600 (CST)
Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 04:58:22 -0600
From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To: Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>, Kimmo Paasiala <kpaasial@gmail.com>,
 freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, FreeBSD current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: CLANG and -fstack-protector
Message-ID: <20130210105822.GA2944@lonesome.com>
References: <CA+7WWSeFh9sJyo3kKD5wTEHoyTSjR6TuDDgDCV5Nhc_wMzVUkg@mail.gmail.com>
 <51141769.5060905@FreeBSD.org>
 <20130207225242.GA5900@felucia.tataz.chchile.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20130207225242.GA5900@felucia.tataz.chchile.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
 <freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-current>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
 <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2013 10:58:29 -0000

On Thu, Feb 07, 2013 at 11:52:42PM +0100, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> You can do this, it will work for most of the ports but some ports do
> not honor CFLAGS.

Ports that don't honor CFLAGS are broken ports.  Having said that,
the last time I ran a script that looked for them (and other things
like CXXFLAGS), the results were really disappointing.

This would be a good project for someone to take on.  OTOH this reply
is probably more appropriate for ports@.

mcl