From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 12 19:14:03 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F406D106566C for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 19:14:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF988FC16 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 19:14:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwi36 with SMTP id 36so3526180wwi.31 for ; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:14:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=rVLP383CZaSU48NvnqmMKa6+WlJR8d/AMaYcf3QPujc=; b=ugnncR6LRmz+b9pCc51Q/KSx1ZqdbPr6anxkr8ETUTjid6c/u66XNzAsZp6/pMIuQT yO+zrnWdUHY57O1A7GuU8FC9mbuGRiSEGxWNaY9i4W++TCJf60Lbb72UopUvcwwYKyv4 JkzL++L+2IS/LiQEpeMfrdAequ4GG3ozy/skQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.68.207 with SMTP id l57mr1573154wed.46.1313176441290; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:14:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.165.17 with HTTP; Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:14:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 12:14:01 -0700 Message-ID: From: Kurt Buff To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: pkdgb and corrupted record(s) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 19:14:03 -0000 On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:17, John Webster wrote: > > > --On August 12, 2011 11:08:01 AM -0700 Kurt Buff wrote: > >> All, >> >> This seems fairly benign so far, but I find it happening on several >> machines after switching from portupgrade to portmaster. Don't know if >> that switch is actually part of the issue or not, though I'm really >> liking portmaster. >> >> Anyone have a thought on this? >> > > Well, now I feel silly - a bit of decent google-fu should have found that. Thanks.