From owner-freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Sun Dec 20 21:54:11 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B95DA4EFAC; Sun, 20 Dec 2015 21:54:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trashcan@ellael.org) Received: from mx1.enfer-du-nord.net (mx1.enfer-du-nord.net [IPv6:2001:41d0:1008:bcb:1:1:0:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29FBA1D80; Sun, 20 Dec 2015 21:54:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trashcan@ellael.org) Received: from [IPv6:2003:45:4845:fc01:8d4a:3ac1:149c:b4b] (p200300454845FC018D4A3AC1149C0B4B.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:45:4845:fc01:8d4a:3ac1:149c:b4b]) by mx1.enfer-du-nord.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3pNyPY2Fs1zrM; Sun, 20 Dec 2015 22:54:09 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\)) Subject: Re: How to define the order of starting jails? From: Michael Grimm In-Reply-To: <56771F8D.4040004@freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 22:54:08 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9E7DF9FD-60D5-497B-8BA5-5350D8167A55@ellael.org> References: <5D6BA0FE-60E1-4C6B-906B-BB62A1AB9BE8@odo.in-berlin.de> <1450639510.27618.8.camel@michaeleichorn.com> <56771F8D.4040004@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99 at mail.kaan-bock.invalid X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104) X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2015 21:54:11 -0000 Allan Jude wrote: >=20 > On 2015-12-20 14:57, Michael Grimm wrote: >> [Arrrgh, I never heard of "service" before (after so many years with = FBSD) :-( What a shame =E2=80=A6] > 'service' was not introduced until FreeBSD 8, iirc. It is mostly a > redhat thing, but is very handy. No, I am not excused, because I arrived at FBSD-6.1. I should have = noticed it in the meantime :-C > Re: jail reverse order, there is a patch to address this, and a PR > somewhere I think: >=20 > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D2088 August 2015, hmm. Well, it might make it into FBSD-11? With kind regards, Michael