From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jul  5 08:25:06 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF32DB60
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sat,  5 Jul 2014 08:25:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6D0122D6
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sat,  5 Jul 2014 08:25:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s658P6Tr048287
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 5 Jul 2014 09:25:06 +0100 (BST)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 191455] x11-fm/doublecmd: no remember editors/lazarus dependency
Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2014 08:25:06 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People
X-Bugzilla-Who: mustelator@yahoo.es
X-Bugzilla-Status: Needs Triage
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-191455-13-jIqBawawTC@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-191455-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-191455-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2014 08:25:07 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191455

--- Comment #6 from Toni Ballesta <mustelator@yahoo.es> ---
Thanks bbtruk. I didn't know the pkg set and the automatic/nonautomatic flag (I
must document more!). And yes, if installing binaries call to lazarus and all
this dependencies, then doesn't the best solution.

But, when I update the ports tree and only I will update doublecmd, why I'm
forced to update the lazarus too if it doesn't needed? Ok if the port tree is
consistent but, if it doesn't need for run (only for build), then I think that 
Lazarus maximum update isn't necessary.

Saludos!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.