From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Mon Aug 1 14:03:00 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94086BAAC7F for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 14:03:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kp@FreeBSD.org) Received: from venus.codepro.be (venus.codepro.be [IPv6:2a01:4f8:162:1127::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.codepro.be", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5416E161A for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 14:03:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kp@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.228.1] (vega.codepro.be [IPv6:2a01:4f8:162:1127::3]) (Authenticated sender: kp) by venus.codepro.be (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D3BF5CCDC; Mon, 1 Aug 2016 16:02:56 +0200 (CEST) From: "Kristof Provost" To: "Christian Mauderer" Cc: "freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Changes to pfctl to allow easier integration into a library Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 16:02:57 +0200 Message-ID: <0C7EC45D-C3BC-4417-AF77-3ACC027D28B5@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: References: <25df9fd5-be75-b9ae-aa3a-22abef3bddf0@embedded-brains.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: MailMate (2.0BETAr6042) X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2016 14:03:00 -0000 On 1 Aug 2016, at 15:03, Christian Mauderer wrote: > Can I improve anything to make the patches more acceptable? > Can you explain why 0003-pfctl-Pull-static-variables-out-of-the-function.patch is required? I’m not sure I see why you need it. > Is the virtualisation that Bjoern mentioned necessary or was my > interpretation correct that this is only meant for kernel space code? I believe your interpretations is correct. User land code should not have to care about VIMAGE. Regards, Kristof