From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 26 10:23:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 809DE16A420; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:23:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from pittgoth.com (14.zlnp1.xdsl.nauticom.net [209.195.149.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0C9843D53; Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:23:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (tradenet-it.gw.ai.net [205.134.160.6] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by pittgoth.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j7QANisI062437 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 26 Aug 2005 06:23:45 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from trhodes@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 06:22:42 -0400 From: Tom Rhodes To: juli mallett Message-ID: <20050826062242.734ffae4@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20050825195416.GA65980@toxic.magnesium.net> References: <200508251022.j7PAMWFO030767@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050825195416.GA65980@toxic.magnesium.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.13 (GTK+ 2.6.8; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libufs Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2005 10:23:52 -0000 On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 09:54:16 -1000 juli mallett wrote: > * Tom Rhodes [ Date: 2005-08-25 ] > [ w.r.t. cvs commit: src/lib/libufs Makefile ] > > trhodes 2005-08-25 10:22:30 UTC > > > > FreeBSD src repository > > > > Modified files: > > lib/libufs Makefile > > Log: > > Hook getino.3 up to the build and link it to putino.3. > > > > PR: 83820 > > This is wrong. As the PR states it was purposely not hooked up. > inode.c doesn't have functions which look like the interfaces you've > just published, and there isn't even a putino(3) in there. If the > cause of the confusion is the manpage being listed in Xr's or > something, then comment out the Xr's. This is very obviously wrong, > if you try to use what's in the manpage I committed. Probably it > shoudln't be in CVS at all. The reason I put it there at the time is > that it was ready and inode.c was about ready to hit CVS, but that > got dropped. Now, if you want to help me remember what P4 tree that > inode.c was in, and pick up whereever I left off, that'd be awesome. Let me understand real quick, it was purposely not hooked up because it was the only file not updated? I mean, I can back this out, no problem; however, I fail to see why nothing is going on with this code. No clue on the branch, sorry. Otherwise, I fear lack of free time is keeping me from much these days. :( -- Tom Rhodes