From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 6 11:35:00 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D07AAA7C for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 11:35:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-x232.google.com (mail-pd0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A612A13D5 for ; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 11:35:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f178.google.com with SMTP id y10so872965pdj.37 for ; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 03:35:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=QvkkUw2OaPf7Xo5MTnbaeLyxjVk5raJ1OLksNwn5/wQ=; b=j/WZgPwhVMfHkB+feTzYkpcxJQ1lrwgYoLWtKBsO1B/uo/OjfEDqzHSXyIFfczDzHv xB5cqjACQwErXdeLF+APmjkX6t47GacH9ltZZ8n7BBhmdVfSTeqDF8GkF7aUebGisUq1 5sqn3DyHvBe39WVu2kd23EdiCaDb02a94MXQYYup9ZuYTV2UDDUTz8CzCX3m6Cmuy7xc 5icZheIWWvvkLZqW3pMXnMTAiKUUrvALDgKXCFo15JRYePmBZJ7Cwhdxr/XoIPxZdunZ 8ri50wFlg8SjLRXHqnbdehnX5tlY562Cu6wx9VkG1XvrUmgUDiOmQbc0dP4inFZKnItn S1UA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.178.143 with SMTP id cy15mr3580584pac.105.1386329700134; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 03:35:00 -0800 (PST) Sender: tomek.cedro@gmail.com Received: by 10.68.191.6 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Dec 2013 03:35:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1386328855.3871.38.camel@debian> References: <1386221592.4385.16.camel@debian> <1386253808.8359.5.camel@debian> <1386328855.3871.38.camel@debian> Date: Fri, 6 Dec 2013 12:35:00 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ILdogoSb_XaCDam46hNGdCap2mk Message-ID: Subject: Re: Why FreeBSD doesn't have a Gnome3 port? From: CeDeROM To: iijima yoshino Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: freebsd-questions , Luca Ferrari X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Dec 2013 11:35:00 -0000 On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 12:20 PM, iijima yoshino wrote: > agree? The users can decide their machines run like desktops or servers. > By default, most distributions have a default DE after installation or > on their live images. I think they should be regarded as > desktop-oriented. On the other hand, it's O.K. to call FreeBSD > server-oriented, right? I use FreeBSD on my desktops and servers with no problem for maaany years :-) Get the Xfce4 or KDE and it will be fine :-) FreeBSD does not force you to any configuration and/or setup, also it does not gets affected by strange politics as it can be seen in case of Gnome/Linux and this is the main reason why I use FreeBSD not other OS :-) Best regards :-) Tomek -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info