From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 10 19:33:11 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A6BB9D3; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 19:33:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from webmail.dweimer.net (24-240-198-187.static.stls.mo.charter.com [24.240.198.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "webmail2.dweimer.local", Issuer "webmail2.dweimer.local" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C17A88DF; Wed, 10 Dec 2014 19:33:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.dweimer.net (webmail [192.168.5.2]) by webmail.dweimer.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sBAJX0YE056517 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:33:01 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dweimer@dweimer.net) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 13:33:00 -0600 From: dweimer To: =?UTF-8?Q?Juan_Ram=C3=B3n_Molina_Menor?= Subject: Re: FreeBSD-SA-14:28 & FreeBSD-SA-14:27 Organization: dweimer.net Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net Mail-Reply-To: dweimer@dweimer.net In-Reply-To: <54889590.20307@club-internet.fr> References: <54889590.20307@club-internet.fr> Message-ID: X-Sender: dweimer@dweimer.net User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1-beta Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 19:33:11 -0000 On 12/10/2014 12:48 pm, Juan Ramón Molina Menor wrote: >>> Did something get missed in these updates to the releng branch, my >>> source updates don't show the RELEASE-p1 in the BRANCH tag in the >>> sys/conf/newver.sh > > It was forgotten: > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=275684 > > Sorry for the noise! > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Good to know, it did through 9.2 & 10.0-RELEASE cycle, I wrote the script when using 9.2, when I switched over to ZFS and using beadm to manage boot environments. I wasn't sure I didn't pick a bad spot, or a change in the process hadn't been intentionally made. I wanted more input to see if I had found an error, or I was at fault. After this update it works correctly. root@freebsd:/usr/src # /scripts/create-beadm-name.sh 10.1-RELEASE-p1-r275684-2014.12.10 Its a really simple script, probably could be made better by someone who knows more about grep and awk than I do: REVISION=`cat /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh | grep "^REVISION=" | awk -F= '{print $2}' | awk -F\" '{print $2}'` BRANCH=`cat /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh | grep "^BRANCH=" | awk -F= '{print $2}' | awk -F\" '{print $2}'` SVNLASTCHANGE=`svnlite info /usr/src/ | grep "^Last Changed Rev:" | awk '{print $4}'` DATE=`date "+%Y.%m.%d"` echo "${REVISION}-${BRANCH}-r${SVNLASTCHANGE}-${DATE}" makes creating a new Boot Environment under a standard naming convention a breeze. beadm create `/scripts/create-beadm-name.sh` The SVN revision isn't to helpful usually on a release, but since I use the same script when testing STABLE as well, I just left it in there. On the production systems I generally do a new boot environment even when updating applications so I may end up with several dates on the same BRANCH with different dates so I can roll back if an updated application fails. I am rebuilding world on my test system now, so I can found out if the uname issue resolves as well, though I expect it will, then time to start rolling through my production servers. -- Thanks, Dean E. Weimer http://www.dweimer.net/