From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 31 14:58:06 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBDCE1FE for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 14:58:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from spectrum.skysmurf.nl (spectrum.skysmurf.nl [82.95.125.145]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 494419FD for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 14:58:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from spectrum.skysmurf.nl (mail.skysmurf.nl [192.168.42.4] (may be forged)) by spectrum.skysmurf.nl (8.14.7/8.14.7) with SMTP id s2VEvt8J092830 for ; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 16:57:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@skysmurf.nl) Received: by spectrum.skysmurf.nl (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 31 Mar 2014 16:57:55 +0200 Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 16:57:55 +0200 From: "A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven" To: FreeBSD ports mailing list Subject: [mail/xmailbopx] Exactly what does "unmaintained" mean? Message-ID: <20140331145755.GA92814@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq" Content-Disposition: inline X-PGP-Key: http://www.skysmurf.nl/~fonz/fonz_pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 14:58:06 -0000 --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, The port mail/xmailbox is set to be removed soon because it has been unmaintained since 2000. In this case, does "unmaintained" refer to just the FreeBSD port, or to the software itself? And in either case, is there anything that can be done to prevent removal? AvW --=20 I'm not completely useless, I can be used as a bad example. --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTOYJzAAoJEAfP7gJTaCe8I50QALUsryNGGRETsXdsq+4o4o/Y 5GKgIY2lMDk6LURHg2Xb4C3tf80EzSA6scACnN0Zm6on/l8EYTbtPUAVDbpPDcPC o5jJIbGxBGWZfoPAwtc92kOIJ4hvY/55pDU+XkGDEjsPvxLDhGcUAjW8zAqZ5AXf bx4fuR0vtRDP7aWRjAuORh2FLu4+mfeTgkria73FTlqQLpHb5Vg8xZJJblbkOsNO 5YNa38HxmnGxC7BnSfgU4Hz8vUPKBIcyMrz/fcwW6vuSvNnipDiZqjNufmPAlCzS Luft1AtKdlXLoqbBrYKqaYAQN807aIYOh3hEhXrFp6GSeSnjLLxx7jc92iJvLq7N YmeK0KrL3LZctuDtr+Dl/M5BI5qXDRKqyMjjVGuyX1XkZdDxZv6NI+mIhEdxIDry 7PFMJ84CiIPqjURSuDT8BaQzDUH5UcroS7q9foRvNxqg3sS46xQFDnmOZ8vpsXnp EJNfzABVdaU4UhvM9e4C+asb/fmTM5m0Al6quGvljEeLMgY8iDj091Oy4CPqPfra +VOVO5e80uaCEzArdWf1KO7ZWJu0mNmEN4ox4/O6lK41C2P8r5DYt6czHMQCDW2P ubQIGjJHjm7FcF6aP5kqWOfLSm+x9dwKgO7mv6xgrBEjiTRfui6gxAbpGkXFCuG2 UuM1LE3/c//zdOFpF830 =/fuH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --45Z9DzgjV8m4Oswq--