From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 13 04:06:56 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 489D237B401 for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 04:06:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nd250009.gab.xdsl.ne.jp (nd250009.gab.xdsl.ne.jp [61.202.250.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 743D243FDF for ; Fri, 13 Jun 2003 04:06:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Received: from nd250009.gab.xdsl.ne.jp ([IPv6:2002:d312:f91e::1]) (authenticated bits=0) by nd250009.gab.xdsl.ne.jp (8.12.9/8.12.9/NinthNine) with ESMTP id h5DB6pNP012036 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 13 Jun 2003 20:06:53 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from nork@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 20:06:53 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <200306131106.h5DB6pNP012036@nd250009.gab.xdsl.ne.jp> From: Norikatsu Shigemura To: Kay Lehmann In-Reply-To: <200306131102.16113.kay_lehmann@web.de> References: <200306131102.16113.kay_lehmann@web.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.2 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: octave-port and octave-forge X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2003 11:06:56 -0000 Hi Kay. On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 11:02:15 +0200 Kay Lehmann wrote: > I have to ask some questions about octave-port. These are all issues, because > I am working on a port for octave-forge, which I am desperate for. > 1. octave-port need some modification since configure-option --enable-shared > needs to be enabled in order to be able to load *.oct-files. This results in > some major changes to pkg-plist, because octave installs some shared > libraries, seems to be build more modular and needs more space to compile and > to be installed. So the question is: should this be an option for octave port > or is it okay to make it the default? If it has to be an option I, think I > need some advice on handling pkg-plist. Please send-pr this problem. But, I'll handle this.