From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Aug 9 16: 8:29 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from ducky.nz.freebsd.org (ns1.unixathome.org [203.79.82.27]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B41D37B6A9 for ; Wed, 9 Aug 2000 16:08:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dan@langille.org) Received: from wocker (wocker.int.nz.freebsd.org [192.168.0.99]) by ducky.nz.freebsd.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA73884 for ; Thu, 10 Aug 2000 11:08:24 +1200 (NZST) Message-Id: <200008092308.LAA73884@ducky.nz.freebsd.org> From: "Dan Langille" Organization: langille.org To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2000 11:08:21 +1200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: INDEX and ports not in the index Reply-To: dan@langille.org X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The latest version of INDEX file has just been released. I've been comparing the file contents with the ports tree. It appears that the INDEX is a snapshot taken sometime on Monday, based upon the ports which aren't in the INDEX and the dates on which they were added to the ports TREE. Would that be about right? For those interested, have a look at: http://freshports.org/ports-not-in-latest-index.php3 Eventually, this page will be automatically refreshed whenever a new INDEX is released. I'm just working on the script to automate it. -- Dan Langille [I'm looking for more work] The FreeBSD Diary - http://www.freebsddiary.org/ FreshPorts - http://freshports.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message