From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 9 23:14:57 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3468716A401 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 23:14:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx24.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B8E2D13C461 for ; Fri, 9 Mar 2007 23:14:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 10948 invoked by uid 399); 9 Mar 2007 23:14:54 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.4?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Mar 2007 23:14:54 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 Message-ID: <45F1EA6A.6070904@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 15:14:50 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0b2 (Windows/20070116) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ade Lovett References: <45F1DDE2.5030404@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.94.2.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jean-Yves Lefort , Kent Stewart , freebsd ports Subject: Re: Ports 104877 causing big problems X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 23:14:57 -0000 Ade Lovett wrote: > > On Mar 09, 2007, at 14:21 , Doug Barton wrote: >> Can we have some response from Ade, and/or portmgr on when this might >> be fixed? I would agree that the current behavior is suboptimal. > > I'm pretty certain that this has been addressed with recent updates to > devel/libtool15 and devel/libltdl15 -- certainly it solved the gnucash > problem that had a similar failure case. > > The patch as it stands in 104877 is flawed in that it brings in > bsd.autotools.mk merely with a GNU_CONFIGURE enabled and as such makes > tree-wide changes to those ports that use this stanza, but not a > USE_AUTOTOOLS stanza, thus giving no incentive for port maintainers > themselves to ensure that the fixes are punted back upstream. > > So, item (1): does the problem actually still exist with a port using > the in-tree devel/libtool15 (via USE_AUTOTOOLS= libtool:15[:env]. If > yes, empirical evidence will be required as an addendum to the PR. If > no, then we're done. So it sounds like a reasonable way to proceed would be for Kent to save a copy of his current libgpg-error +REQUIRED_BY file, then run one of the commands that mezz suggested, and compare the before and after pictures. If the problem is fixed, they should be substantially different. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection