From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 31 15:17:55 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4A3AAE8; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 15:17:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from spectrum.skysmurf.nl (spectrum.skysmurf.nl [82.95.125.145]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38DFABE3; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 15:17:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from spectrum.skysmurf.nl (mail.skysmurf.nl [192.168.42.4] (may be forged)) by spectrum.skysmurf.nl (8.14.7/8.14.7) with SMTP id s2VFHqVw005292; Mon, 31 Mar 2014 17:17:52 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@skysmurf.nl) Received: by spectrum.skysmurf.nl (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 31 Mar 2014 17:17:52 +0200 Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 17:17:52 +0200 From: "A.J. 'Fonz' van Werven" To: Antoine Brodin Subject: Re: [mail/xmailbopx] Exactly what does "unmaintained" mean? Message-ID: <20140331151752.GA5169@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> References: <20140331145755.GA92814@spectrum.skysmurf.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP-Key: http://www.skysmurf.nl/~fonz/fonz_pubkey.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: FreeBSD ports mailing list X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2014 15:17:55 -0000 --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Antoine Brodin wrote: > Would you like to take maintainership of this port, and add stage > support to it? In and of itself, sure, of course. But I'd need some time to thoroughly check and sort out this port: stagify, check for a newer upstream version, see if there's really no WWW, (as Kurt Jager pointed out) look into getting rid of Imake, check for bugs that need patching, etc. AvW --=20 I'm not completely useless, I can be used as a bad example. --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTOYcgAAoJEAfP7gJTaCe85AIQAKw+5+qNsQs9Q6+na9aSXGtF v7LKQWPTR/d+8x8yNtIR0U+0JX6v6xvi1ZL+Wsp4hurOo915ywtBgo6NlMPYIvn5 3HzGEDnobpzDepj3Ni6PFUXVYyLxz26s/azAeICcNwvDFQMpL1P0HGkNrzi9+MLs 5gSTGEsJ4Fz7DKbg9MXfRYXinUQXBRU2ltWR4WYWHyd/UDf7mnIiSsOJoYqwNB5c 37td0BEHRtsNNy4A+i3W666D0seAGNLaK8N+6mnFH2zuRjhxhqMtzfyWI1AFpECs HJ4w8fBraIKMR6XcqMUjh7vNrVLtf+FsvdGA6udVX9aPPy344X8oD8GsDaHJn+34 956dwAQUbTxJaTrCm1ZHFCdz+7UTdQcCTHEoK0Z/dgOQDu8X0YH2oJFDLtFjD+M3 ERmvtCQt6Xl0MhdhIRv2BTkI4byyPTuR2lwbCfwGBe+wSsxj8bGvJvBRKgqmM26g y2DxoMnfY/ixwp61R3sNGfl3Iqog4nceJvQK2pjwt6QtDfwl+PIVXR+4K7GPoY82 XEO2B0bFQugZajhZK5TuSufR2lEUiaxdGztL1N55QpS/xjf3juL1fdD4RSzXKtAJ ny7w9FB+YfBl9VljKaLqEDcs6IWetbzCh7NsOwFAlrzhzyt8pP6OKctyBML59DB3 hEI8NQHkrn/adtOSwlQF =G9I6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3--