From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 28 16:20:45 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E80E816; Wed, 28 May 2014 16:20:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C5E02885; Wed, 28 May 2014 16:20:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7470BB917; Wed, 28 May 2014 12:20:44 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: sbruno@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Investigating failed suspend/resume T61 Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 12:20:24 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.4-CBSD-20140415; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <1400861698.1126.0.camel@bruno> <201405281054.53558.jhb@freebsd.org> <1401293455.1050.1.camel@bruno> In-Reply-To: <1401293455.1050.1.camel@bruno> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201405281220.24778.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Wed, 28 May 2014 12:20:44 -0400 (EDT) Cc: "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 16:20:45 -0000 On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 12:10:55 pm Sean Bruno wrote: > On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 10:54 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > On Wednesday, May 28, 2014 7:08:36 am Sean Bruno wrote: > > > On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 16:14 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > > > On Tuesday, May 27, 2014 1:39:48 pm Sean Bruno wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2014-05-27 at 11:32 -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > > > > > On Friday, May 23, 2014 12:14:58 pm Sean Bruno wrote: > > > > > > > Trying to figure out the failures on suspend resume for the T61 I have. > > > > > > > I see a little acpi error at host startup, but I don't think its > > > > > > > related. However, I'm not sure what it means. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > sean > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ------ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #1 r265820: Sat May 10 15:13:37 PDT 2014 > > > > > > > sbruno@bruno:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BRUNO amd64 > > > > > > > FreeBSD clang version 3.4 (tags/RELEASE_34/final 197956) 20140216 > > > > > > > VT: running with driver "vga". > > > > > > > CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7300 @ 2.00GHz (1995.04-MHz > > > > > > > K8-class CPU) > > > > > > > Origin="GenuineIntel" Id=0x6fa Family=0x6 Model=0xf Stepping=10 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Features=0xbfebfbff > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Features2=0xe3bd > > > > > > > AMD Features=0x20100800 > > > > > > > AMD Features2=0x1 > > > > > > > TSC: P-state invariant, performance statistics > > > > > > > real memory = 2147483648 (2048 MB) > > > > > > > avail memory = 2007138304 (1914 MB) > > > > > > > Event timer "LAPIC" quality 400 > > > > > > > ACPI APIC Table: > > > > > > > FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs > > > > > > > FreeBSD/SMP: 1 package(s) x 2 core(s) > > > > > > > cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID: 0 > > > > > > > cpu1 (AP): APIC ID: 1 > > > > > > > ACPI BIOS Warning (bug): 32/64X length mismatch in FADT/Gpe1Block: 0/32 > > > > > > > (20130823/tbfadt-601) > > > > > > > ACPI BIOS Warning (bug): Optional FADT field Gpe1Block has zero address > > > > > > > or length: 0x000000000000102C/0x0 (20130823/tbfadt-630) > > > > > > > > > > > > It might be related as Gpe1Block describes a register set that IIRC is used > > > > > > to enter sleep states. Can you put your acpidump -t somewhere? (No need > > > > > > for -d as this is in the FADT, not the DSDT.) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Here --> http://people.freebsd.org/~sbruno/T61_acpidump.txt > > > > > > > > Ah, so the warning is due to the fact that the 'FACP' table has 'X_GPE1_BLOCK' > > > > but no 'GPE1_BLOCK'. (Note how it has both 'GPE0_BLOCK' and 'X_GPE0_BLOCK' > > > > which say the same thing.) Try this workaround to quiet the warning. I've > > > > no idea if it will help at all with suspend/resume. > > > > > > > > Index: sys/contrib/dev/acpica/components/tables/tbfadt.c > > > > =================================================================== > > > > --- tbfadt.c (revision 266442) > > > > +++ tbfadt.c (working copy) > > > > @@ -601,6 +601,10 @@ AcpiTbValidateFadt ( > > > > ACPI_BIOS_WARNING ((AE_INFO, > > > > "32/64X length mismatch in FADT/%s: %u/%u", > > > > Name, ACPI_MUL_8 (Length), Address64->BitWidth)); > > > > + if (Length == 0) > > > > + { > > > > + Length = ACPI_DIV_8 (Address64->BitWidth); > > > > + } > > > > } > > > > > > > > if (FadtInfoTable[i].Type & ACPI_FADT_REQUIRED) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > One warning went away, one remains, not sure if its meaningful or not. > > > > > > ACPI BIOS Warning (bug): 32/64X length mismatch in FADT/Gpe1Block: 0/32 > > > (20130823/tbfadt-601) > > > > Yes, I didn't remove that warning, I just fixed it to use the 64-bit length > > when the 32-bit length was zero when that warning fires. Does this seem to > > have made any difference with anything on the laptop? (E.g. it might possibly > > affect hotkeys, etc.) > > > > > Believe it or not, but I just suspend/resumed on the thing, TWICE. Once > from the xfce menu -> suspend and once from > Fn->moonsymbolsuspendsleepthing on the F4 key. > > Good grief. Thanks John. Humm. I wonder if we can get the Intel guys to accept the patch upstream? -- John Baldwin