From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Dec 3 02:05:49 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id CAA23965 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 02:05:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.gtn.com (mail.gtn.com [194.77.0.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id CAA23960 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 02:05:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andreas@klemm.gtn.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by mail.gtn.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) with UUCP id LAA28042; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 11:00:13 +0100 (MET) Received: (from andreas@localhost) by klemm.gtn.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id IAA15828; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 08:53:02 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from andreas) Message-ID: <19981203085302.B1209@klemm.gtn.com> Date: Thu, 3 Dec 1998 08:53:02 +0100 From: Andreas Klemm To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: Eivind Eklund , hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Can we just come to a decision on IPv6 and IPSec? References: <19981203002629.A26879@klemm.gtn.com> <9834.912642230@zippy.cdrom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i In-Reply-To: <9834.912642230@zippy.cdrom.com>; from Jordan K. Hubbard on Wed, Dec 02, 1998 at 03:43:50PM -0800 X-Disclaimer: A free society is one where it is safe to be unpopular X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 3.0-CURRENT SMP Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, Dec 02, 1998 at 03:43:50PM -0800, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote: > > Could the people you mention evaluate KAME on a 2.2.7 system ? > > Or could perhaps a dialogue between those people and KAME > > developers help to do the right decision ? I personally don't > > know people using IPsec... > > I'm not really interested in what it does on 2.2.7, to be perfectly > honest. It's good that the old releases be supported, don't > misunderstand me, but 3.0 is the future and if it's not running in > -current then it's just not a candidate for merging to that branch, > for the obvious reasons. Fully agreed. Fortunately KAME is available for -current as well. I only assumed that those people you mentioned would have 2.2.X systems. But indeed, one should ask the KAME developer, if they would agree to develope on 3.0 and later -current systems. This shouldn't be a problem if think if they would be more involved into the FreeBSD project via commit privs or such. -- Andreas Klemm http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~andreas What gives you 90% more speed, for example, in kernel compilation ? http://www.FreeBSD.ORG/~fsmp/SMP/akgraph-a/graph1.html "NT = Not Today" (Maggie Biggs) ``powered by FreeBSD SMP'' To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message