From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Jan 31 6:41:41 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from artemis.drwilco.net (diana.drwilco.net [66.48.127.79]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B696C37B41D; Thu, 31 Jan 2002 06:41:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from ceres.drwilco.net (docwilco.xs4all.nl [213.84.68.230]) by artemis.drwilco.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g0VEfWi44549 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher DES-CBC3-SHA (168 bits) verified NO); Thu, 31 Jan 2002 09:41:34 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from drwilco@drwilco.net) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020131155013.01c870c8@mail.drwilco.net> X-Sender: lists@mail.drwilco.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2002 15:51:21 +0100 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG From: "Rogier R. Mulhuijzen" Subject: Re: Again Softupdates on 4.5 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >It sounds as if the default five seconds isn't always enough time for >your disk to do its job. (I've only done poweroff on an idle system so >I haven't run into such a problem myself.) > >I don't see it would hurt anything for this default to be increased to >help out this problem. But what value would be good? Wouldn't the Right Thing (tm) be to ask the controllers/disk whether or not their caches are clean? Assuming such a thing is even possible. Doc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message