From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 8 10:25:58 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D10437B42C for ; Thu, 8 May 2003 10:25:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.bsdimp.com [204.144.255.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4865343FEC for ; Thu, 8 May 2003 10:25:55 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (warner@rover2.village.org [10.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.12.8/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h48HPsTl020782; Thu, 8 May 2003 11:25:54 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 11:25:26 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20030508.112526.68226550.imp@bsdimp.com> To: gordont@gnf.org From: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20030508172326.GP76376@roark.gnf.org> References: <20030508165844.GO76376@roark.gnf.org> <20030508.110858.91024289.imp@bsdimp.com> <20030508172326.GP76376@roark.gnf.org> X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.2 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /rescue X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 May 2003 17:25:58 -0000 In message: <20030508172326.GP76376@roark.gnf.org> Gordon Tetlow writes: : On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 11:08:58AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: : > In message: <20030508165844.GO76376@roark.gnf.org> : > Gordon Tetlow writes: : > : On Thu, May 08, 2003 at 09:39:11AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: : > : > : > : > Tim posted this a while ago to hackers@. It looked like it was : > : > further along than what's been posted here. : > : : > : Actually, Tim's and my work are complimentary. I hadn't worked on : > : getting a /rescue, /stand, /ohcrap directory. Personally, I agree : > : with David O'Brien that it should be called /stand since we have : > : precedence (and documentation in hier(7)) for that. : > : > NetBSD put them in /rescue. /stand has been phased out over the past : > few years. There's precident many ways. Can we please not argue of : > stupid shit like this? That's why we get into these damn bikesheds. : : Bikeshed? I wouldn't call it a bikeshed yet, and let's not get to that : point if we can avoid it. If we want a clean break, so be it. I don't : particularly care one way or the other. I just expressed my preference. I guess the recent name hiding thread has gotten my bikeshed trigger on 'hair' no. Warner