From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Apr 12 20:26:43 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AE8416A400 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 20:26:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-03.mxes.net (mxout-03.mxes.net [216.86.168.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 648DE13C448 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 20:26:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B7E951999 for ; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 16:26:42 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 21:26:39 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070412212639.6299d37f@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20070412172357.GD82155@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> References: <20070412122954.493cajcveoko88ko@mail.schnarff.com> <20070412172357.GD82155@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.8.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Using portsnap after sysinstall X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 20:26:43 -0000 On Thu, 12 Apr 2007 12:23:57 -0500 Brooks Davis wrote: > > I really wish sysinstall would install a copy of ports created by > portsnap and provide an option to install the associated working > files. As things stand, I never install the ports collection from > sysinstall because it takes forever and I just end up deleting it. > IMO the current behaviour is actually very sensible. The ports tree on the disk is from a period of time when maintainers were holding-off doing anything radical, and just fixing bugs - it's the closest thing we have to a ports release. It's also the same snapshot that was used to create the binary packages, which minimizes dependency problems if you need to mix ports and packages. If your aim is to get a reliable system up quickly and easily, running portsnap can be the wrong thing to do.