From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 14 23:08:09 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05668B1C for ; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 23:08:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8F91187E for ; Mon, 14 Apr 2014 23:08:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-108-40.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.108.40]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DB0B72764C; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 01:07:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s3EN6pHR002694; Tue, 15 Apr 2014 01:06:52 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2014 01:06:51 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Andrew Berg Subject: Re: Possible? - FBSD 10 and Apache on CF Soekris? Message-Id: <20140415010651.5e3d58af.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <534C58BE.1030906@my.hennepintech.edu> References: <534BE2ED.6010102@dat.pl> <444n1w55si.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <534C58BE.1030906@my.hennepintech.edu> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 23:08:09 -0000 On Mon, 14 Apr 2014 16:53:02 -0500, Andrew Berg wrote: > On 2014.04.14 10:51, edflecko . wrote: > > Finally, I'm sure I'll be customizing the kernel for Soekris so will > > the poudriere > > method of keeping the system up to date work for a custom kernel? > Ports/packages (third-party software) and the base system are separate. > Poudriere will let you build ports on one machine and let others grab > the binary packages. I'm not sure what you can do for base, but others > might. Fortunately, base does not need updates very often. Without particular testing, I'd say this is possible. All you need is the basic /usr/src tree (top level files and maybe others) which are in sync with what you use to build on a different machine. Then you need access to the build results located in /usr/obj (or where you direct the output at), and then perform the installation steps. Another idea would be to generate "delta packages" comparable to the distributions usually found on the installation media, and then simply extract them to the correct locations on the local machine. Maybe this can even be integrated with freebsd-update (but of course with your own source). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...