From owner-freebsd-mobile Sat Apr 17 2:31:48 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from moss.nibb.ac.jp (moss.nibb.ac.jp [133.48.46.64]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1577814C07 for ; Sat, 17 Apr 1999 02:31:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tomoaki@biol.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by moss.nibb.ac.jp (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA25684; Sat, 17 Apr 1999 18:29:18 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from tomoaki@biol.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp) To: listmail@helena.callcenter.systemhaus.net Cc: freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: tomoaki@biol.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Subject: Re: Fiberline Ethernet, part two From: Tomoaki NISHIYAMA In-Reply-To: <199904161838.UAA02904@helena.otelo-call.de> References: <199904161838.UAA02904@helena.otelo-call.de> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94b8 on Emacs 19.34 / Mule 2.3 (SUETSUMUHANA) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <19990417182917T.tomoaki@moss.nibb.ac.jp> Date: Sat, 17 Apr 1999 18:29:17 +0900 X-Dispatcher: imput version 990212(IM106) Lines: 19 Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org From: Christoph Weber-Fahr Subject: Re: Fiberline Ethernet, part two Date: Fri, 16 Apr 1999 20:38:57 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <199904161838.UAA02904@helena.otelo-call.de> listmail> In tests this gives me between 300 and 600 KBps. Is this to be listmail> expected via PCMCIA, or should it be faster ? It is likely that its working well. listmail> Is PAO worth installing now that my card works without it ? Perhaps not necessary, but if the only card to be used were a network card, I would use 3.1 RELEASE or 3.1-STABLE. I stay 2.2 for the SCSI card, and love PAO for SCSI_DETACH. -------- Tomoaki Nishiyama e-mail:tomoaki@biol.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp Department of Biological Sciences, Graduate School of Science, The University of Tokyo To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message