From owner-freebsd-current  Sun Dec 12  2:24:24 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.40.131])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05A5514BE2
	for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 12 Dec 1999 02:24:22 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.9.3/8.9.2) with ESMTP id LAA16583;
	Sun, 12 Dec 1999 11:23:59 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk)
To: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com>
Cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com>,
	John Robert LoVerso <john@loverso.southborough.ma.us>,
	freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Modules and sysctl tree 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 11 Dec 1999 22:42:25 PST."
             <Pine.BSF.4.10.9912112241580.26823-100000@current1.whistle.com> 
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 1999 11:23:58 +0100
Message-ID: <16581.944994238@critter.freebsd.dk>
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In message <Pine.BSF.4.10.9912112241580.26823-100000@current1.whistle.com>, Jul
ian Elischer writes:

[sysctlfs]

>Linux have basically done this in their procfs.

And have recently started to wonder if that wasn't a mistake I've heard.

I would regard sysctlfs as a grave mistake.

--
Poul-Henning Kamp             FreeBSD coreteam member
phk@FreeBSD.ORG               "Real hackers run -current on their laptop."
FreeBSD -- It will take a long time before progress goes too far!


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message