From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 25 01:19:10 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF28E1065672 for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 01:19:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx22.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4622B8FC18 for ; Sun, 25 Jan 2009 01:19:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 4113 invoked by uid 399); 25 Jan 2009 01:19:09 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO ?192.168.0.19?) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 25 Jan 2009 01:19:09 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <497BBE2C.5060103@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:19:40 -0800 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Andrews References: <200901250113.n0P1DmHe060610@drugs.dv.isc.org> In-Reply-To: <200901250113.n0P1DmHe060610@drugs.dv.isc.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: lev@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: BIND 9.4.3-P1: internal_send: 199.7.83.42#53: Device not configured, where 199.7.83.42 is RANDOM IP address X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Jan 2009 01:19:11 -0000 Mark Andrews wrote: > In message <497B9FF4.30605@FreeBSD.org>, Doug Barton writes: >> Any time you are using NFS you should maintain the addresses of the >> critical hosts in /etc/hosts. Yes, I realize that's anachronistic >> (especially for a DNS guy) but it works. Obviously you should make >> sure to update them as needed. > > Or keep a local copy of the zone which contains them. I actually considered suggesting that option, but it's unclear to me whether or not named would answer at all, even for a local zone, given the situation described. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection