From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Dec 6 15:35:22 1995 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id PAA04358 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 6 Dec 1995 15:35:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA04336 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 1995 15:35:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id PAA21114; Wed, 6 Dec 1995 15:34:32 -0800 To: Mark Hittinger cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Second appeal for sup, CTM, mail and www servers. Please help! (fwd) In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 06 Dec 1995 09:50:35 CST." <199512061550.JAA06141@freebsd.netcom.com> Date: Wed, 06 Dec 1995 15:34:32 -0800 Message-ID: <21111.818292872@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk How about some of that netcom bandwidth? I'd say that's the commodity more valuable than gold at the moment? :-) Jordan > >From: Jon Loeliger > >Stupid question: Is this just a matter of "donated machine" or > >is it more than that (bandwidth) too? Would another machine next > >door to freefall be a valid approach? In particular, freely speaking > >for some of us (:-), I'd say many of us would be willing to chip in, > >say, $20 to $100 (each!) towards a dedicated machine. Would this > >approach work to give freefall a buddy? > > Here here! I'd be willing to "chip" in :-) > > Regards, > > Mark Hittinger > Netcom/Dallas > bugs@freebsd.netcom.com > voice: 214-550-6175