From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 1 03:52:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5C8716A4DD for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 03:52:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 327B043D4C for ; Tue, 1 Aug 2006 03:52:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from coolf89ea26645 (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k713pxx96290; Mon, 31 Jul 2006 20:51:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Message-ID: <001001c6b51d$e724b760$3c01a8c0@coolf89ea26645> From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Chris Whitehouse" , "Joao Barros" References: <20060726164622.Q17979@ganymede.hub.org> <20060726201933.GH5284@jeeves.stilyagin.local> <20060726185018.BB70.GERARD@seibercom.net> <20060726231555.GB19000@gothmog.pc> <84b68b3d0607271127k175100d9sa3285fadc53e5369@mail.gmail.com> <20060728161300.M27679@ganymede.hub.org> <20060728223813.GA31151@jeeves.stilyagin.local> <70e8236f0607281842i7997f338i49d39f59f0177806@mail.gmail.com> <44CE888F.4050505@childeric.freeserve.co.uk> Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 20:52:24 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Are hardware vendors starting to bail on FreeBSD ... ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Aug 2006 03:52:05 -0000 > I wanted to ask if there is some sort of channel whereby he could be > given active support See a need, fill a need. Since you can clearly see the person wasn't given adequate information, then go ahead and give him the information. Unless people like you and me and the rest of us ordinary users take responsibility for these responses, a lot of them will fall through the cracks since the developers have limited time to answer them. Nobody ever complained about being given too much information. Ted ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Whitehouse" To: "Joao Barros" Cc: Sent: Monday, July 31, 2006 3:47 PM Subject: Re: Are hardware vendors starting to bail on FreeBSD ... ? > Joao Barros wrote: > > And on the subject, has anyone noticed this email from someone > > @Promise to the scsi mailing list? > > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-scsi/2006-July/002543.html > > > > I wanted to reply about this post but I'm hesitating because I know > there are more people who talk than act and I can only talk because I > wouldn't know how to act here. Still... > > Assuming it's genuine Promise are offering to supply a driver for > FreeBSD. The responder points them to the send-pr doc (unfortunately > with a broken link but that is not my point.) The reply is a typical > laconic freebsd reply which would be sufficient for another freebsd > user. However this is an offer which could possibly be considered gold > dust since it is a hardware manufacturer offering to work with FreeBSD. > I wanted to ask if there is some sort of channel whereby he could be > given active support so that he doesn't just go away because he thinks > nobody is particularly interested. > > Of course maybe someone has already responded off list in which case > very sorry for the noise. > > Chris > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >