From owner-freebsd-security Sun Jan 23 18:14:24 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20E6F156F5 for ; Sun, 23 Jan 2000 18:14:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA97999; Sun, 23 Jan 2000 19:14:06 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id TAA47946; Sun, 23 Jan 2000 19:14:38 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <200001240214.TAA47946@harmony.village.org> To: Peter Jeremy Subject: Re: kernel panic's still due to mbuf problems. Cc: Darren Reed , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 24 Jan 2000 12:53:49 +1100." <00Jan24.125351est.115220@border.alcanet.com.au> References: <00Jan24.125351est.115220@border.alcanet.com.au> <200001232329.KAA02494@cairo.anu.edu.au> Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2000 19:14:38 -0700 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message <00Jan24.125351est.115220@border.alcanet.com.au> Peter Jeremy writes: : This subject has been discussed regularly and so far, no-one has : managed to produce a solution which does not entail a significant : performance hit. It's generally accepted that the current behaviour : is undesirable and if you have real solution to offer, I'm sure : it'll be gratefully accepted. I'm working on that... Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message