From owner-freebsd-current Wed Mar 13 22:26:27 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from corp1.cbn.net.id (corp1.cbn.net.id [202.158.3.24]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 824FD37B402 for ; Wed, 13 Mar 2002 22:26:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from dante.naver.co.id (unknown [202.158.82.9]) by corp1.cbn.net.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id 451A61E674 for ; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 13:26:11 +0700 (WIT) Received: by dante.naver.co.id (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7AB315B63C; Thu, 14 Mar 2002 13:24:51 +0700 (WIT) Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2002 13:24:51 +0700 From: John Indra To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: malloc() and the stock Perl in -CURRENT (and -STABLE) Message-ID: <20020314132451.F8244@office.naver.co.id> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20020314104525.B8244@office.naver.co.id> <40628.1016085846@critter.freebsd.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40628.1016085846@critter.freebsd.dk>; from phk@critter.freebsd.dk on Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 07:04:06AM +0100 X-Mailer: Mutt 1.2.5.1i on FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, Mar 14, 2002 at 07:04:06AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >At the cost of considerable complexity (a mremap(2) implementation amongst >other things), realloc in phkmalloc(3) can be optimised but it is not >on my plate right now. Glad to know that there is no problem with malloc() in -CURRENT. But I still think that this must be addressed in Perl. So maybe, the stock Perl should be built against its own malloc library? Thank you for the clarification. /john "I go, I fight, and I win!" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message