From owner-freebsd-stable Mon Jul 6 00:31:19 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id AAA21817 for freebsd-stable-outgoing; Mon, 6 Jul 1998 00:31:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from server.amis.net (server.amis.net [195.10.52.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA21810 for ; Mon, 6 Jul 1998 00:31:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from blaz@gold.amis.net) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by server.amis.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with UUCP id JAA25581; Mon, 6 Jul 1998 09:30:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (blaz@localhost) by gold.amis.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA00451; Mon, 6 Jul 1998 09:27:01 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 6 Jul 1998 09:27:00 +0200 (CEST) From: Blaz Zupan To: Morgan Davis cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Best ethernet card for 2.2.6-RELEASE In-Reply-To: <000101bda896$b9873a90$24ae44c6@cts.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > I'm interested in the opinions of those who frequent this list on what they > consider the best 10/100mbit PCI ethernet card for FreeBSD 2.2.6-RELEASE. > And, given that 2.2.7 is scheduled soon, would your recommendation still > apply, or does 2.2.7 open up support for newer cards (like the SMC > EtherPower II 10/100 which 2.2.6 does not recognize)? I'd say Intel Etherexpress Pro 10/100B without the blink of an eye. I don't use it in 100MB mode (yet), but in 10MB it outperforms anything I have seen and the driver is more stable than the Tulip (de) driver. This is all IMHO. Blaz Zupan, blaz@medinet.si, http://home.amis.net/blaz Medinet d.o.o., Linhartova 21, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message