From owner-freebsd-hardware  Wed Apr 23 09:21:39 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hardware>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA07813
          for hardware-outgoing; Wed, 23 Apr 1997 09:21:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lariat.lariat.org ([129.72.251.2])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA07798
          for <hardware@freebsd.org>; Wed, 23 Apr 1997 09:21:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from solo.lariat.org ([129.72.251.10])
	by lariat.lariat.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA29752;
	Wed, 23 Apr 1997 10:19:52 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <3.0.1.32.19970423101930.006a67b4@lariat.org>
X-Sender: brett@lariat.org
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.1 (32)
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 1997 10:19:30 -0600
To: torstenb@ramsey.tb.9715.org, dufault@hda.com
From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
Subject: Re: Yet another Adaptec 2940UW problem :(
Cc: gurney_j@resnet.uoregon.edu, hardware@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <88256482.005607DF.00@IWND1.infoworld.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Sender: owner-hardware@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

This isn't the same thing.... I don't think. This looks as if the FreeBSD
system is still the initiator and the scanner is a target (of the catch-all
"processor" type). I'd like to make the FreeBSD system act as a target.
(And, no, that doesn't mean I'd like to throw it in the air and shoot at
it.... ;-)

--Brett

At 04:59 PM 4/23/97 +0300, torstenb@ramsey.tb.9715.org wrote:
 
>Peter Dufault wrote:
>
>> As far as I know it is still only the AHA1542 that supports processor
>> target mode.  I suggest adding NCR support.
>
>Hm, I have a box here with an Adaptec 2940 and my HP Scanjet is recognized
>as an processor type target:
>
>ahc0 <Adaptec 2940 SCSI host adapter> rev 0 int a irq 12 on pci0:10
>ahc0: aic7870 Single Channel, SCSI Id=7, 16 SCBs
>
>ahc0:A:5: refuses synchronous negotiation. Using asynchronous transfers
>(ahc0:5:0): "HP C2500A 3332" type 3 fixed SCSI 2
>pt0(ahc0:5:0): Processor
>
> -tb