From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Wed Jul 8 16:17:01 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 316E3996730 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 16:17:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@dyslexicfish.net) Received: from dyslexicfish.net (deadcat.mail.dyslexicfish.net [45.63.12.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED0EA1DC7 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 16:17:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@dyslexicfish.net) Received: from dyslexicfish.net (deadcat.mail.dyslexicfish.net [45.63.12.202]) by dyslexicfish.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t68GGc5C047714 for ; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 17:16:38 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jamie@dyslexicfish.net) Received: (from jamie@localhost) by dyslexicfish.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id t68GGcY9047713 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Wed, 8 Jul 2015 17:16:38 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jamie) From: Jamie Landeg-Jones Message-Id: <201507081616.t68GGcY9047713@dyslexicfish.net> Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 17:16:38 +0100 To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gettimeofday((void *)-1, NULL) implicates core dump on recent FreeBSD 11-CURRENT References: <201507072241.t67MfsX5085860@hergotha.csail.mit.edu> <94BCDA65-5B86-4329-A312-4CB16E847B69@dons.net.au> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.4 7/29/08 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (dyslexicfish.net [45.63.12.202]); Wed, 08 Jul 2015 17:16:38 +0100 (BST) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2015 16:17:01 -0000 Oliver Pinter wrote: > On 7/8/15, O'Connor, Daniel wrote: > > > > In defence of the test, the man page says it can return EFAULT. > > That's fine, but why changed the behaviour since 2015. May 27.? I have > an older FreeBSD/HardenedBSD install, where this test passing. See > some previous email in this thread. That's why it's called 'undefined' :-) Pedantically, being 'undefined', it's behaviour hasn't changed at all!